There has been a lot of talk in recent years about “the death of expertise,” but when an outcome matters, smart people still consult experts. That’s especially true in the law. Expert witnesses in medical malpractice cases often the difference between a claim that succeeds and one that fails.
Medical malpractice cases are complex and highly technical. Simply hearing the facts of what happened is often not enough to help a jury understand whether a doctor or facility committed malpractice. Medical malpractice expert witnesses help juries understand the relevance of those facts, and whether they add up to a valid claim.
The elements of a medical malpractice claim are the factors that must be proven to show that malpractice did, in fact, take place. They are:
If any one of those elements is not proven, a claim for medical malpractice must fail. An expert witness’s knowledge is essential in helping a jury understand things like:
In short, medical malpractice expert witnesses can help juries determine not only that the elements of a claim have been met, but what the value of the claim is. For an injured patient, the services of a good expert witness can mean that they recover the funds they need to live the best life possible after their injury.
An expert witness in a medical malpractice doesn’t simply show up on the day of trial and hold forth from the witness stand. Reputable medical malpractice attorneys work with a trusted expert from the outset of a case to determine whether there is a claim that can be proven. Often, the involvement of a respected witness in a case motivates the insurance company to make a favorable settlement offer to avoid having to confront the expert at trial. A strong settlement offer also benefits the malpractice victim, who then receives a financial recovery sooner and without having to go through the stress of a drawn-out trial.
Not just anyone can serve as an expert witness in a medical malpractice case. Under Rule 702 of the Oregon Evidence Code, a witness “qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training or education” may testify if their scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact (the jury, or the judge if there is no jury) to understand the evidence in a case or determine a fact in issue in the case.
As a practical matter, that usually means:
Oregon focuses on the substance of an medical malpractice expert witness’s knowledge and experience rather than only considering their credentials. An expert witness doesn’t always have to be in the exact same specialty as a defendant (the professional being sued). However, if they are not, the methods, techniques, and practices must be generally similar so that the expert’s testimony will be relevant to the issue at hand.
Not all medical expert witnesses are created equal, and just because a professional may qualify to testify as an expert under the Oregon Evidence Code doesn’t mean that they are the best choice for the role. At the Fraser Firm, we understand the important role of an expert witness in a medical malpractice case, and we use the most respected, knowledgeable, and trustworthy experts. With our focus on medical malpractice and personal injury matters, we have developed relationships over the years with numerous specialists whose reputations are stellar and whose knowledge and testimony are persuasive.
While a medical malpractice expert witness’s knowledge of medicine is critical, it is also essential that they be able to clearly communicate that knowledge to a jury. Other witnesses testify to the facts; the expert witness in a medical malpractice case explains what those facts mean. For that reason, our firm uses experts who are not only experienced medical professionals, but clear and effective communicators. To learn more about the role of expert witnesses in medical malpractice cases, or how our firm would work with experts in your particular case, please contact the Fraser Law Firm to schedule a consultation.